Skip to main content Advertisement PLOS One Publish Submissions Getting Started Submission Guidelines Figures Tables Supporting Information LaTeX What We Publish Preprints Revising Your Manuscript Submit Now Calls for Papers Policies Best Practices in Research Reporting Human Subjects Research Animal Research Competing Interests Disclosure of Funding Sources Licenses and Copyright Data Availability Complementary Research Materials, Software and Code Sharing Ethical Publishing Practice Authorship Corrections, Expressions of Concern, and Retractions Manuscript Review and Publication Criteria for Publication Editorial and Peer Review Process Editor Center Guidelines for Reviewers Accepted Manuscripts Comments Submit Your Manuscript Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. Learn More Submit Now About Why Publish with PLOS ONE Journal Information Staff Editors Editorial Board Section Editors Advisory Groups Find and Read Articles Publishing Information Publication Fees Press and Media Contact Browse Search Search advanced search Browse Subject Areas ? Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field. For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here. Loading metrics Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article No evidence that women using oral contraceptives have weaker preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces Urszula M. Marcinkowska , Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing * E-mail: ummarcinkowska@gmail.com Affiliation Faculty of Public Health, Department of Health Sciences, Medical College Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6851-4513 ⨯ Amanda C. Hahn, Roles Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing Affiliation Department of Psychology, Humboldt State University, Humboldt, Arcata, California, United States of America ⨯ Anthony C. Little, Roles Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing Affiliation Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom ⨯ Lisa M. DeBruine, Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing Affiliation Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom ⨯ Benedict C. Jones Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing Affiliation Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom ⨯ No evidence that women using oral contraceptives have weaker preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces Urszula M. Marcinkowska, Amanda C. Hahn, Anthony C. Little, Lisa M. DeBruine, Benedict C. Jones x Published: January 10, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210162 Article Authors Metrics Comments Media Coverage Reader Comments Figures Figures Abstract Previous research has suggested that women using oral contraceptives show weaker preferences for masculine men than do women not using oral contraceptives. Such research would be consistent with the hypothesis that steroid hormones influence women’s preferences for masculine men. Recent large-scale longitudinal studies, however, have found limited evidence linking steroid hormones to masculinity preferences. Given the relatively small samples used in previous studies investigating putative associations between masculinity preferences and oral contraceptive use, we compared the facial masculinity preferences of women using oral contraceptives and women not using oral contraceptives in a large online sample of 6482 heterosexual women. We found no evidence that women using oral contraceptives had weaker preferences for male facial masculinity than did women not using oral contraceptives. These findings add to a growing literature suggesting that links between reproductive hormones and preferences are more limited than previously proposed. Citation: Marcinkowska UM, Hahn AC, Little AC, DeBruine LM, Jones BC (2019) No evidence that women using oral contraceptives have weaker preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces. PLoS ONE 14(1): e0210162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210162 Editor: Yuka Kotozaki, Iwate Medical University, JAPAN Received: April 9, 2018; Accepted: December 18, 2018; Published: January 10, 2019 Copyright: © 2019 Marcinkowska et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability: The minimal data set has been uploaded to Open Science Framework and is available at: https://osf.io/dcz5t/. Funding: This work has been supported by Polish National Science Centre Grant no. 2014/12/S/NZ8/00722 (https://www.ncn.gov.pl/?language=en) to UMM and ERC grants OCMATE (https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/101375_en.html) and KINSHIP awarded to BCJ and LMD, respectively. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Introduction Masculine facial characteristics in men are hypothesized to be cues of a strong, heritable immune system but also of reduced willingness to invest in relationships [1–3]. Given a proposed trade off between the benefits and costs of choosing a masculine mate, women could maximize the potential genetic and investment benefits of their mate choices by mating with men with masculine facial characteristic when fertile, while forming long-term relationships with men with relatively feminine facial characteristics [1–3]. Consistent with this proposal, many studies have reported stronger preferences for masculine male faces when women were tested during the ovulatory (i.e., high-fertility) phase of their menstrual cycle [3, 4]. However, these studies have been criticized for being underpowered and relying on self-report data to estimate women’s position in the menstrual cycle [5, 6]. Recent longitudinal studies that directly addressed these criticisms by testing large samples of women and assessing women’s hormonal status using measured hormone levels have found no compelling evidence that women’s preferences for masculine male faces track changes in their hormonal status or fertility [7, 8]. Research examining possible associations between oral contraceptive use and women’s masculinity preferences is a second line of evidence that steroid hormones influence preferences for masculine men. The rationale for these studies is that oral contraceptive use will cause weaker masculinity preferences because it is negatively correlated with fertility [8–12]. Some of these studies have reported that women using oral contraceptives showed weaker preferences for masculine male faces than did women not using oral contraceptives [9, 10]. Additionally, one longitudinal study has reported that women’s preferences for masculine male faces decreased after they started using oral contraceptives [11]. However, other recent studies found that women using oral contraceptives reported stronger preferences for masculine male faces than did women not using oral contraceptives [8, 12] and that changing use of oral contraceptives did not have a significant effect on women’s preferences for masculinity in men’s faces [8]. To further examine associations between oral contraceptive use and masculinity preferences, we carried out a large-scale study to compare preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces in a sample of women who reported using oral contraceptives (N = 1857) and a sample of women not using oral contraceptives (N = 4625). If oral contraceptive use is linked to weaker masculinity preferences, women using oral contraceptives would be expected to show stronger preferences for feminized versions of men’s faces than women not using hormonal contraceptives. Some previous studies have suggested that women’s masculinity preferences might be related to their age [13] and partnership status [3] and that hormonal status might also influence women’s judgments of same-sex faces [14]. The rationale for these predictions is that older women may have stronger preferences for masculine men because they look older [13], that partnered women have stronger preferences for masculine men because such women already have an investing partner (i.e., a partner who will invest resources, such as time, in the relationship [3]). Steroid hormones might also alter women’s perceptions of feminine women by altering the extent to which women are motivated to affiliate with same-sex individuals who appear to be caring social partners, altering the extent to which women monitor high-quality competitors for mates, or simply as a low-cost functionless by-product of adaptations for assessing potential mates[14]. Consequently, we also collected and analyzed data on women’s age, partnership status, and preferences for masculinity-femininity in women’s faces. Materials and methods Participants Six thousand four hundred and eighty-two heterosexual women (mean age = 23.01 years, SD = 5.34 years; age range 16 to 40 years) took part in this online study, which was run at faceresearch.org. One thousand eight hundred and fifty-seven of the women reported using the oral contraceptive pill and 4625 of the women reported using no form of hormonal contraceptive. No participants included in our analyses reported being pregnant or using any other form of hormonal supplement. An additional 402 women who reported using forms of hormonal contraceptives other than the oral contraceptive pill or hormonal supplements were tested, but were excluded from the data set prior to analyses. One thousand eight hundred and thirty-three of the women reported being in a romantic relationship at the time of testing and 1703 of the women reported that they were not (the remaining 2946 women did not report their partnership status, for more information see S1 Supplementary Materials). All participants provided informed consent and all aspects of the study were approved by the University of Glasgow’s Psychology Ethics Committee (OCMATE project). Stimuli Following previous studies of individual differences in women’s preferences for masculine faces [7–10], we used prototype-based image transformations to objectively manipulate sexual dimorphism of 2D shape in face images. First, male and female prototype (i.e. average) faces were manufactured using established computer graphic methods that have been widely used in studies of face perception [15]. These prototypes were manufactured using face images of 20 young White male adults and 20 young White female adults, respectively. Next, 50% of the linear differences in 2D shape between symmetrized versions of the male and female prototypes were added to or subtracted from face images of 20 young White male adults and 20 young White female adults. This process creates masculinized and feminized versions of the individual face images that differ in sexual dimorphism of 2D shape and that are matched in other regards. Examples of masculinized and feminized versions of male and female faces are shown in Fig 1. These stimuli are publicly available [16]. The individuals in this manuscript have given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details. Download: PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 1. Examples of masculinized (right) and feminized (left) versions of male and female face images used in the study. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210162.g001 Procedure Participants were shown the 40 pairs of face images and were asked to choose the face in each pair that was more attractive. Participants also indicated the strength of these preferences by choosing from the options ‘slightly more attractive’, ‘somewhat more attractive, ‘more attractive’, and ‘much more attractive’. The order in which pairs of faces were shown was fully randomized and the side of the screen on which any particular image was shown was also fully randomized. Responses were coded using a 0 (masculinized face judged much more attractive than feminized face) to 7 (feminized face judged much more attractive than masculinized face). These preference scores were centered on chance before being used in our analyses. Results Analyses were conducted using R v3.4.3. Data, analysis code, and full results are publicly available at https://osf.io/dcz5t/ and in S1 Supplementary Materials. First, we analyzed preference scores using a mixed effect model (using lmer [17], and lmerTest [18]) with the within-subject factor sex of face (effect coded male = 0.5, female = -0.5), the between-subject factor use of oral contraceptives (effect coded yes = 0.5, no = -0.5), and the covariate participant age (z-scored). Random intercepts were included for participant and stimulus, with random slopes specified maximally (following recommendations in [19, 20]). There was a significant main effect of sex of face (estimate = -1.023, se = 0.140, t = -7.333, p < .001), whereby women showed stronger femininity preferences when judging women’s than men’s faces. There was a significant interaction between sex of face and use of oral contraceptives (estimate = -0.060, se = 0.026, t = -2.319, p = .021). There were no other significant effects (both p > .11). The interaction between sex of face and use of oral contraceptives was explored by repeating the analysis above separately for male and female faces. Women using oral contraceptives showed stronger femininity preferences than women not using oral contraceptives when assessing women’s faces (estimate = 0.056, se = 0.017, t = 3.266, p = .001), but not when assessing men’s faces (estimate = -0.010, se = 0.022, t = -0.467, p = .641). For female faces, the positive intercept (estimate = 1.007, se = 0.083, t = 12.164, p < .001) indicated femininity preferences were significantly above chance. For male faces, the near-zero intercept (estimate = -0.017, se = 0.112, t = -0.155, p = 0.879) indicated femininity preferences were not significantly different from chance. For female faces, there was a significant positive effect of participant age (estimate = 0.019, se = 0.007, t = 2.585, p = .010), indicating that older women had stronger preferences for female femininity. For male faces, there was a significant negative effect of participant age (estimate = -0.025, se = 0.009, t = -2.732, p = .006), indicating that older women had stronger preferences for male masculinity. Next, we repeated the analysis above, this time with partnership status (effect coded partnered = 0.5, unpartnered = -0.5) as an additional between-subject factor (note that the sample size is smaller for this analysis because 2946 women did not report their partnership status and, consequently, could not be included in this analysis). As in the previous analysis, there was a significant main effect of sex of face (estimate = -1.033, se = 0.141, t = -7.307, p < .001), indicating that women showed stronger femininity preferences when judging women’s than men’s faces. There were no other significant effects (all p > .11). Discussion Our analyses revealed no evidence that women using oral contraceptives showed weaker preferences for masculine men than did women who were not using oral contraceptives. Our data do not then support the hypothesis that oral contraceptive use is associated with (and potentially causes) weakened preferences for masculinity in male faces [9–11]. The current study’s null result for oral contraceptive use and masculinity preference adds to a growing body of evidence challenging the claim that women’s preferences for exaggerated sexual dimorphism in men are related to their reproductive hormones [7, 8]. Although we found no evidence that preferences for masculine men differed between women using and not using oral contraceptives, our analysis suggested that women using oral contraceptives showed stronger preferences for feminine women. Some researchers have suggested that stronger preferences for feminine women when women are in conditions associated with low fertility could reflect reduced intrasexual competitiveness [21]. However, given this association between oral contraceptive use and femininity preferences was not apparent in our analysis of the reduced, but still large, sample (the 3536 women for who partnership data were available), we suggest it is most likely a false positive. In line with previous studies, we found that women preferred feminized versions of women’s faces over masculinized versions [22]. However, women did not prefer masculinized versions of men’s faces over feminized versions in the current study, which is consistent with the generally mixed findings for the attractiveness of masculine male faces in the facial attractiveness literature [2]. By contrast with Little et al. [10], we found no evidence that partnered women showed stronger preferences for masculine men than unpartnered women did. This null result suggests that the positive effect of partnership status on women’s preferences for masculine men reported previously is not robust or is more complex than previously thought. Although we found that older women tended to show stronger preferences for masculine men (see also [9]), this relationship was very weak. Like previous studies using this type of between-subjects design to test for evidence of the possible effects of oral contraceptive use on women’s masculinity preferences that reported significant between-group differences [10], we did not distinguish between (and do not have data on) the types and brands of oral contraceptives women were using. Thus, it is possible that comparisons taking into account these factors could yet reveal differences in the masculinity preferences of women not using oral contraceptives and women using specific types and/or brands (see, e.g., [23] for a study reporting correlations between oral contraceptive composition and aspects of women’s mating psychology). While we do not discount this possibility, it would be at odds with null results reported in recent high-powered studies testing for links between endogenous steroid hormones and masculinity preferences [7, 8]. Similarly, we did not consider possible effects of participant ethnicity on face preferences. Since participant ethnicity may be correlated with oral contraceptive use, it would be useful to control for participant ethnicity in future research using this type design. In conclusion, we replicated the finding that women show stronger preferences for feminine shape characteristics in women’s faces than they do in men’s faces [8, 21, 22]. However, we found no evidence that oral contraceptive users showed weaker preferences for masculine men than do women not using oral contraceptives. These findings add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that oral contraceptive use has limited association with women’s mate preferences [8, 12] and mating psychology [24]. Supporting information S1 Supplementary Materials. All supporting information has been included in the “S1 Supplementary Materials”. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210162.s001 (PDF) References 1. Gangestad SW, Simpson JA. The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2000;23(4):573–+. WOS:000166610300056. pmid:11301543 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 2. Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci. 2011;366(1571):1638–59. WOS:000290088200002. pmid:21536551 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 3. Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Castles DL, Kobayashi T, Burt DM, Murray LK, et al. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature. 1999;399(6738):741–2. WOS:000081101600034. pmid:10391238 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 4. Johnston VS, Hagel R, Franklin M, Fink B, Grammer K. Male facial attractiveness—Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2001;22(4):251–67. WOS:000170117700003. View Article Google Scholar 5. Blake KR, Dixson BJW, O'Dean SM, Denson TF. Standardized protocols for characterizing women's fertility: A data-driven approach. Hormones and behavior. 2016;81:74–83. WOS:000377846900010. pmid:27072982 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 6. Gangestad SW, Haselton MG, Welling LLM, Gildersleeve K, Pillsworth EG, Burriss RP, et al. How valid are assessments of conception probability in ovulatory cycle research? Evaluations, recommendations, and theoretical implications. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2016;37(2):85–96. WOS:000370888300001. View Article Google Scholar 7. Marcinkowska UM, Galbarczyk A, Jasienska G. La donna e mobile? Lack of cyclical shifts in facial symmetry, and facial and body masculinity preferences-A hormone based study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;88:47–53. Epub 2017/11/22. pmid:29161637. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 8. Jones BC, Hahn AC, Fisher CI, Wang H, Kandrik M, Han C, et al. No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women's hormonal status. bioRxiv. 2017. View Article Google Scholar 9. Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Little AC. Correlated preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2008;29(4):233–41. WOS:000257025100002. View Article Google Scholar 10. Little AC, Jones BC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci. 2002;269(1496):1095–100. WOS:000176255600002. pmid:12061950 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 11. Little AC, Burriss RP, Petrie M, Jones BC, Roberts SC. Oral contraceptive use in women changes preferences for male facial masculinity and is associated with partner facial masculinity. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38(9):1777–85. WOS:000325188300032. pmid:23528282 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 12. Cobey KD, Little AC, Roberts SC. Hormonal effects on women's facial masculinity preferences: The influence of pregnancy, post-partum, and hormonal contraceptive use. Biological psychology. 2015;104:35–40. WOS:000348034700005. pmid:25460829 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 13. Little AC, Saxton TK, Roberts SC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Vukovic J, et al. Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age range and lower around puberty and post-menopause. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010;35(6):912–20. WOS:000279078100013. pmid:20060226 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 14. Jones BC, Little AC, Boothroyd L, DeBruine LM, Feinberg DR, Law Smith MJ, et al. Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and behavior. 2005;48(3):283–90. WOS:000231629500006. pmid:15979620 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 15. Tiddeman B, Burt M, Perrett D. Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. Ieee Computer Graphics and Applications. 2001;21(5):42–50. WOS:000170643300008. View Article Google Scholar 16. Lisa D, Benedict J. Young Adult White Faces with Manipulated Versions2017. View Article Google Scholar 17. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. 2015. 2015;67(1):48. Epub 2015-10-07. View Article Google Scholar 18. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. 2017. 2017;82(13):26. Epub 2017-11-29. View Article Google Scholar 19. Barr D. Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013;4(328). pmid:23761778 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 20. Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of memory and language. 2013;68(3):10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. PMC3881361. pmid:24403724 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 21. Welling LLM, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Conway CA, Smith MJL, Little AC, et al. Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces. Hormones and behavior. 2007;52(2):156–61. WOS:000249004500004. pmid:17559852 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 22. Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S, Burt DM, et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. 1998;394(6696):884–7. WOS:000075611800046. pmid:9732869 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 23. Welling LLM, Puts DA, Roberts SC, Little AC, Burriss RP. Hormonal contraceptive use and mate retention behavior in women and their male partners. Hormones and behavior. 2012;61(1):114–20. WOS:000300120000017. pmid:22119340 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 24. Jern P, Kärnä A, Hujanen J, Erlin T, Gunst A, Rautaheimo H, et al. A high-powered replication study finds no effect of starting or stopping hormonal contraceptive use on relationship quality. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.02.008. View Article Google Scholar Download PDF Citation XML Print Share Reddit Facebook LinkedIn Mendeley Bluesky Email Advertisement Subject Areas ? For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here. We want your feedback. Do these Subject Areas make sense for this article? Click the target next to the incorrect Subject Area and let us know. Thanks for your help! Female contraception Is the Subject Area "Female contraception" applicable to this article? Yes No Thanks for your feedback. Oral contraceptive therapy Is the Subject Area "Oral contraceptive therapy" applicable to this article? Yes No Thanks for your feedback. Male contraception Is the Subject Area "Male contraception" applicable to this article? Yes No Thanks for your feedback. Face Is the Subject Area "Face" applicable to this article? Yes No Thanks for your feedback. Steroid hormones Is the Subject Area "Steroid hormones" applicable to this article? Yes No Thanks for your feedback. Ethnicities Is the Subject Area "Ethnicities" applicable to this article? Yes No Thanks for your feedback. Longitudinal studies Is the Subject Area "Longitudinal studies" applicable to this article? Yes No Thanks for your feedback. Prototypes Is the Subject Area "Prototypes" applicable to this article? Yes No Thanks for your feedback. Publications PLOS Aging and Health PLOS Biology PLOS Climate PLOS Complex Systems PLOS Computational Biology PLOS Digital Health PLOS Ecosystems PLOS Genetics PLOS Global Public Health PLOS Medicine PLOS Mental Health PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases PLOS One PLOS Pathogens PLOS Sustainability and Transformation PLOS Water Home Blogs Collections Give feedback LOCKSS Privacy Policy Terms of Use Advertise Media Inquiries Contact PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, based in California, US